Baby died after abuse by crack addict mother whose first baby was taken away by social services

A young mother was behind bars today for a ‘horrific’ campaign of cruelty against her helpless two-month-old son who died hours after her last attack on him.

Former crack addict Claire Biggs, 27, repeatedly crushed Rhys’. chest causing numerous rib fractures. His right wrist and shoulder were also broken.

Despite the fact that she had already had one ‘at risk’ child taken into care by social services, Biggs was allowed to keep her baby.

Medical experts said ’severe’ force must have been used each time.

inner london crown court

Cruelty: Claire Biggs was found guilty of wilful assault and boyfriend Paul Husband was found guilty of wilful negligence after the death of two-month-old Rhys

They told Inner London Crown Court the injuries would have been ‘extremely painful’.

Even Biggs admitted her helpless son – whose blood-spattered clothes were found throughout her one-bedroom flat – spent eight hours screaming in agony on one occasion.

Not once did her live-in lover, Paul Husband, 33, do anything to stop her or help the baby. Aid from anyone else was also denied him.

During his short life, Rhys briefly came under the care of two London boroughs, first Newham and then Camden.

But despite the efforts of health workers to check on him, Biggs repeatedly failed to keep pre-arranged appointments.

The court was told when police examined their flat they discovered a blood-stained teddy bear and 11 items of bloodied baby wear from the bathroom laundry basket, bedroom and living room.

Because the cause of Rhys’s death could not be established, the defendants ended up being charged with child cruelty.

In evidence Biggs insisted her boyfriend was responsible and branded him a ‘murderer’. He told the 10 men and two women trying him he had nothing to do with the child’s suffering.

But after considering the evidence for just three hours, jurors unanimously convicted both as charged – her on the basis of ‘wilful assault’ after deciding she was responsible for her son’s injuries; him under a ‘wilful neglect’ alternative for ignoring his obvious pain and failing to get him medical assistance.

As the verdicts were announced the pair, of Greengate Street, Newham, east London, burst into tears.

Remanding them in custody, Judge Lindsay Burn said he wanted the benefit of pre-sentence reports before dealing with them on March 10. He also ordered a psychiatric report for Biggs.

Outside court, Detective Chief Inspector Dave Marshall of the Met’s Child Abuse Investigation Command, said: ‘This was a very difficult investigation in view of the fact we could not establish the cause of death, although obviously Rhys had horrific injuries inflicted on him.

“He was just eight weeks old and for half of his life he suffered repeatedly as his bones were fractured on at least three separate occasions.”

The three-week trial heard that Biggs initially came to the attention of the health authorities as far back as 2001, when, at just 19, she became a mother for the first time.

At the time she was homeless and on crack and it was decided that her premature daughter, who cannot be named for legal reasons, should be taken into care.

In 2005 she began an affair with Rhys’s father. They went their separate ways while she was still pregnant.

Not long afterwards, and before she had her son, she began an affair with Husband.

Ian McDonald QC, prosecuting, said that, when the child arrived, Biggs was living at a Camden women’s refuge because of problems with a previous partner.

She then moved to a similar refuge in Enfield before being allocated a flat in Canning Town.

But because it needed improvements, she moved in with her co-defendant instead.

The barrister said the first hint of the tragedy came in a 999 phone call Biggs made at 8am on Monday May 8, 2006.

She told an ambulance operator that her son had stopped breathing and her partner was ‘trying to bring him back’.

As Husband was heard ’swearing in the background’, she went on to suggest he had been the one to find him.

The baby was rushed to Newham University Hospital, but, ‘despite the best efforts’ of a team of doctors, he was pronounced dead 35 minutes after the alarm was raised.

Jurors were told that a member of staff could not help but notice that every time Husband tried to comfort Biggs, she would punch him in the chest and tell him ‘get away from me’ and ‘it’s your fault’.

For his part he repeatedly replied: ‘You’ve got to be strong for me.’

A post-mortem revealed that Rhys had ’suffered a large number of bone fractures resulting from the application of severe force on at least three different occasions’.

The first, caused by ’severe side-to-side squeezing’ when he was just a month old, broke 10 ribs on both sides of his chest.

Two weeks later he suffered three further rib fractures as a result of ’severe front-to-back squeezing’.

‘There was a further and distinct series of fresh fractures to four ribs on the right-hand side, each fracture having occurred in the 24 hours leading up to death,’ said counsel.

‘Again, this type of fracture may be caused by a squeezing force.’

Mr McDonald said three other fractures ‘about the same age’ were found on his right arm – one affecting his shoulder and two his wrist.

‘All could have occurred as a result of a single severe application of force, for example, by gripping the wrist, twisting and forcefully yanking the baby’s arm.’

Jurors heard that, despite a careful medical examination, it could not be established whether Rhys’s death ‘resulted from the actions of another individual or some other cause’.

But they were told that did not change the fact that he ‘had been exposed to severe force on at least three separate occasions, one of those occasions within 24 hours of death.

‘And, in the absence of any sensible alternative explanations, these injuries are strongly suggestive of deliberately inflicted injuries.’

Lager-drinking mother convicted of being drunk in charge of pram

article-1129306-0333e17d000005dc-803_233x4231

Arrested: Nicola Gardner

A woman was arrested after she was seen staggering across a road drunk in charge of a double buggy carrying two young children.

Motorists were forced to slow down as Nicola Gardner zig-zagged across a busy road with an open can of Stella lager in the pram.

Fearful that the buggy would topple over with a two-year-old toddler and a four-month old baby inside, some drivers stopped to make sure they were safely on the pavement.

When police arrived at Old Chester Road, Higher Bebington, Wirral, on November 4 last year Gardner did not even know the children’s names.

The 37-year-old, from St Anne Street, Birkenhead, was convicted of being drunk in charge of children.

She appeared before Wirral magistrates for sentencing today.

Anna Beeho, prosecuting, said: ‘When officers approached they could smell intoxicants.

‘When they asked about the children she said they belonged to the daughter of a friend.

‘She added that she did not know their names.’

Officers said her shouting was upsetting the children. Soon after, Gardner told police she was an alcoholic.

She denied being drunk in charge of the children but was found guilty at trial.

She also admitted criminal damage committed while she was held in a cell.

Tessa Hinder, defending, said her client was of previous good character.

She told the court: ‘There has been no suggestion of anything like this in the past and she accepts that she has a drink problem.’

Magistrates sentenced Gardner to a 12-month supervision order and sent her on an alcohol rehabilitation course. She also has to pay £250 costs.

Social worker struck off after failing to protect 13-month-old toddler who was beaten to death

article-1129084-03328a47000005dc-517_233x423

Killed: Aaron Gilbert died from brain damage after he was attacked by Andrew Lloyd in 2006. His social worker Eleni Cordingley was struck off after failing to protect him

A social worker has been struck off over the brutal murder of a toddler whose injuries left him looking ‘like the Elephant Man’.

Social services official Eleni Cordingley was banned from working after failing to protect 13-month-old Aaron Gilbert from his mother’s brutal boyfriend.

Mrs Cordingley failed to follow proper child protection procedures which could have saved little Aaron from his savage beatings.

A conduct hearing was told Aaron died from brain damage after he was attacked by his mother’s boyfriend Andrew Lloyd.

One neighbour later told police that Aaron was so deformed by his injuries before his death that he ‘looked like the Elephant Man’.

In 2006 Lloyd was jailed for a minimum of 24 years for the baby’s murder and mother Rebecca Lewis became the first British woman to be convicted of allowing her child to be murdered by a violent partner.

She was jailed for six years for familial homicide by failing to protect her child.

Social services in Swansea, South Wales, had two anonymous calls from the same ‘whistle blower’ with fears about Aaron’s safety.

But Cordingley failed to respond properly to protect Aaron – when alarm bells should have rung.

A conduct hearing told Cordingley: ‘By exercising extremely poor judgement you failed to work in a safe and effective way.

‘The misconduct admitted in this case is considered to be so serious that removal from the register is the only appropriate sanction.

‘This is necessary for the protection of the public and to uphold the public interest in maintaining confidence in social care services.’

article-1129084-03328b60000005dmc-83_224x344

Jailed: Rebecca Lewis, pictured with Aaron, became the first woman in Britain to be jailed for allowing her child to be murdered by Lloyd, right

Aaron was beaten to death by Lloyd, 23, after social workers, police and health service staff missed repeated chances to prevent the tragedy.

Lewis, 21, regularly watched Lloyd beat the little boy – causing more than 50 injuries.   She once saw him pick up Aaron by his ears and throw him across the room.

Bullying Lloyd would swear at the boy and blow smoke into his face. He once promised ‘to smash your little head in’.

Lloyd would flick the baby’s ears and feet, making him scream in pain, and Aaron would ’shiver in fright’ at the sight of him. Lewis also said she saw Lloyd swing the child around violently by the ankles.

Sharon Hurlow, 53, rang Swansea social services twice in a week when she noticed  13-month-old Aaron had alarming bruises on his body.

She said: ‘I feel like we’ve finally won. I tried to warn social services, but nothing happened.

‘Little Aaron would be running around now, off to school, if people had listened to me.

‘Instead, he’s in a small dark grave all alone – his little body black and blue.

‘You think that if you see a child being hurt and have the guts to report it, then something will be done.’

Aaron’s father Gareth Gilbert said: ‘I am pleased to hear about this. I agree with every word of the judgment.

‘Nothing will ever replace Aaron. But I think this person involved should make an apology to me personally.’

Mrs Cordingely was removed from the social worker register at the hearing by the Care Council for Wales Conduct Committee Hearing in Cardiff.

A Swansea council spokesman said: ‘The death of Aaron Gilbert in 2005 was a terrible tragedy and Swansea council is very sorry that it happened.

‘Following the care council’s decision we have taken immediate steps to suspend the social worker.

‘We will also need to consider what further action may be necessary in the light of the evidence and outcome of the care council hearing.

‘It found that prior to the first anonymous phone call, Aaron was not known to social services. He was not on the at-risk register.

‘However, it concluded that all the agencies involved with the family had important lessons to learn and made recommendations on how these should be implemented.’

The council said more than £350,000 has been spent in the last year to recruit extra social workers.

‘Why I told my husband my lover’s child was his’, by the woman at the centre of the ‘paternity fraud’ case

The mother at the centre of the ‘paternity fraud’ case spoke for the first time yesterday about the torment she has faced over her daughter’s true identity.

Lydia Chapman has been widely vilified after being accused of deliberately deceiving her former husband, Mark Webb, about the paternity of daughter Elspeth – but now justifies her actions, saying she did what she needed to do to try to keep her family together.

For nearly two decades, despite her doubts, she kept up the pretence that her husband was Elspeth’s biological father.

article-0-032ab6c4000005dc-147_468x669

Lydia Champan, with daughter Elspeth (right) and daughter India

Finally she confessed the truth: that her eldest daughter had been conceived following a brief night of passion with a married friend.

And last week, Mr Webb, 47, lost a long court battle to claw back the money he had spent on Elspeth’s upbringing.

So far, Lydia has been condemned for keeping Elspeth’s true parentage a secret. Now, in an emotional interview with The Mail on Sunday, Lydia reveals why she not only deceived her husband but also kept the devastating truth from her daughter.

To the outside world, she appeared the devoted wife with a fulfilling married life in rural Wiltshire but secretly she found herself at the centre of a very modern moral dilemma.

Although many readers will find her attempts to justify her deceit uncomfortable, she believes she did her best to save her marriage.

Lydia, now 45, grew up in a close and happy family in the small market town of Devizes, Wiltshire, the eldest of three daughters of Tony, a tyre fitter, and Gloria, a secretary. At the age of 15, she met Mark Webb at a friend’s house.

‘The first thing I noticed was that he had this dominating character. It wasn’t exactly that he was full of life or jokey, more that there was a confidence about him,’ she says. ‘He seemed so much more grown up than I was. But then, I was still just a child.’

Mark made Lydia feel like an adult, and despite her parents’ concern at their relationship because they felt she was too young, Lydia became smitten.

But Lydia says he quickly became controlling. Despite her dreams of becoming a nurse, Mark did not want her moving away to college and instead Lydia left school at 16 and did a secretarial course.

article-0-0328e6a7000005dc-228_468x716

For 17 years, Mark Webb, pictured on his wedding day to Lydia, was unaware someone else was Elspeth's father

The pair bought an old house in town and Mark repaired it with her father. But he began to show signs of a worrying temper. ‘If something he was doing wasn’t going well he would punch a wall or throw something across a room. He just wanted to destroy something.’

Although his behaviour scared her, she says he was never threatening. But they argued frequently and every few weeks he would say he was leaving, which she believes was his way of manipulating her.

Despite this, the couple married when she was 19 in June 1982, selling their car to pay for the wedding. Mark had a job for a company that manufactured parts for telegraph poles. He started off on the production line and was gradually promoted. She was working as a secretary for a computing company.

‘I think I helped him become ambitious,’ says Lydia, ‘although he was very reluctant to buy a house and would have been happy in a council house, like the one he’d grown up in.

‘He was bitter about that, and kept telling me I had a better upbringing. But his parents were just like mine, really.

‘He always felt I was too close to my family. If ever I thought something he didn’t agree with, he would blame my family. But if I was being swayed by them it was for good reason. Their opinion counted.’

The first few years were ‘like playing happy families’, Lydia says. Both keen runners, they joined a local club and would go to the cinema. However, she says Mark’s controlling behaviour began to take its toll.

‘He used to tell me no one else would love me, that I would be on my own if he left. That really dents your confidence and self esteem,’ she says. ‘But you don’t realise it’s happening. I was in denial for years. You also don’t want to acknowledge it to your family.

‘I started off as a bubbly person and that all changed. I got more and more worn down as the months went on. Friends said I used to be quite opinionated but as the marriage developed I would adopt his opinions.

‘It was difficult to explain because he would never put me down in public but he shouted a lot at home and I’m just not used to that, coming from a mainly female house. I was terrified. But I still begged him to stay with me.’

article-0-032a3702000005dc-412_468x4731

Allen Mottram is Elspeth's biological father, having made Lydia pregnant 22 years ago

Lydia also began to suspect that Mark was having affairs. ‘I’d confront him about my suspicions but it would only end up in a row,’ she says.

Lydia says that it was this fragile emotional state, at the tender age of just 22, that led her to drink heavily at a work conference she had helped organise in Windsor. Also there was Allen Mottram, who was known as David, a colleague who had become a friend.

‘I wasn’t used to lots of alcohol,’ Lydia says. ‘For me, two glasses of wine and I was drunk. But I had started drinking more and more. I don’t want to say it happened just because I was drunk but you certainly do things you wouldn’t normally under such circumstances.

‘I had been friends with him and he was a high-flyer, older than me at 36 and married. But we got on well.’

What Lydia insists happened next may sound difficult to believe. She says there was a mix-up at their hotel and David’s booking had been lost. David has since claimed she seduced him.

‘This was the first time I had really been away from home and I said, “Well, just stay with me, I’ve got twin beds.”

‘And that was it. That was Elspeth. There was no passionate sex scene. I just drank too much.’

Lydia, horribly ashamed of her indiscretion, hid from Mottram at work and says they barely spoke afterwards. She went to a family-planning clinic and took the morning-after pill.

While she felt guilty, she says her suspicions about Mark’s affairs prevented her from confessing. It was only a couple of months later, when she began suffering morning sickness, that she realised she was pregnant. Ashamed of her indiscretion and unable to talk to friends, Lydia confided in her GP.

She says: ‘He told me that if I had been having regular unprotected sex with my husband and a single one-night stand, the chances were the baby would be my husband’s. He was very matter-of-fact, and told me to go away and stop wasting NHS money.

‘I hadn’t spoken to anyone else, and I left convinced that the baby was Mark’s. It was far easier than to confront the doubt.’

Knowing David was married, Lydia did not tell him about the pregnancy either. Mark later claimed that the pair concocted a conspiracy of silence to cover up their guilt but Lydia dismisses this as ‘nonsense’.

Mark also claimed his wife and David met again at a barbecue when Elspeth was three months old and had sex at a local picnic site, which Lydia adamantly denies.

Lydia often wondered over the first few years whether Mark was Elspeth’s father. ‘I had no idea which man was the father, but there was no conspiracy,’ she says. ‘Everything pointed to it being Mark.

‘Everyone says I must have felt guilty but I didn’t, not really. The love for the child takes over and Elspeth was loved by both of us.’

Mark became the doting father, suspecting nothing, and a couple of years later the couple had another child, India.

He was a good father and idolised Elspeth with her blonde curls. In hindsight, Lydia says Elspeth resembles David but says she did not look at Elspeth and think of him.

However, for Lydia, who was by now working in a number of menial, part-time jobs, the marriage was crumbling again as she believed her husband was still having affairs. She said he would shower before supposedly going running or cycling.

One Boxing Day, when India was around seven months old, he told Lydia he was going to decorate his receptionist’s mother’s house. When she asked him why, he told her she was cruel for trying to prevent him.

‘There were so many incidents like that, and eventually I decided I needed a proper job to gain some independence,’ she says. ‘I had begun to think about leaving him.’

She contacted David, who had set up a new IT company in Swindon, and asked him for a job. They had been in touch sporadically as friends and she claims that rekindling their relationship was not on her mind.

‘He was a friend and he knew I was unhappy. I told him everything –about the affairs I thought Mark was having. I didn’t tell him about the other arguments but I think he probably knew.

‘He had noticed I was acting differently. I had lost so much weight – as you do when you’re stressed and running round manically.’

She and David began sleeping together again but Lydia describes it as an occasional comfort – once or twice a year in a house owned by the company – rather than a fullblown affair.

‘There was never any sense that it would be more than it was and neither of us considered leaving our partners to be together,’ she says.

The mask had, however, begun to slip. Lydia was drinking more to hide from the emotional distress and she began to wonder whether Mark was Elspeth’s father. At a party in around 1990, she thinks she may have confided in one of David’s friends – and that word may have somehow got back to Mark.

‘Mark rounded on me once and said, “Tell me Elspeth’s mine. In fact, no. I don’t want to know anything.” It was never spoken of again. We decided to keep the marriage together, even though I suspected he had a few women on the go at that point.’

Lydia suspects that Mark had as many as ten affairs during their marriage. Some were work colleagues, one a barrister and another a school matron. She says she found out from other people over the years.

All the while, she and Mark continued to sleep together, and had a third daughter. The Mail on Sunday has agreed not to name her to protect her identity while she is still at school.

The new child made Lydia more determined to keep her family together. She stopped seeing David and left her job with him. All the girls were happy and had won music scholarships to private schools.

‘I was trying to keep the family together, to put on a brave face to everyone outside, pretending it was all OK. All I’ve ever wanted to do is provide a family home the same as I had: happy for the children. But he seemed to want to destroy it.’

It was Mark’s affair with a work colleague in 2000 that finally brought everything to a head.

‘This was the first one that I found out about, which was devastating and completely collapsed the marriage,’ she says. ‘I came downstairs one evening and there was a message on his phone saying, “I love you, Mark, I will always want to be with you.”

‘I knew who she was as I’d met her and Mark kept going on about how wonderful she was. That was the hardest night. I confronted him – the ranting, raving, screaming woman. And he admitted it.

‘The children were crying and it was devastating. At that point, I was very ill and depressed because of the stress of it all. I had a massive nervous breakdown which resulted in hospital treatment on several occasions. I was depressed and not eating properly.

‘It all came out at once, the whole story. I finally confessed everything to my friends and to my parents. I told my mum I didn’t think Elspeth was Mark’s. At this point I wasn’t even sure why I thought that. She just looked different and I had buried it for so long.

‘There’s a Salvador Dali painting of a cupboard with lots of drawers and I always think, “That’s me.”

‘Everything was closed away, all the emotional stress contained. But one day a drawer opened and it all came out.’

The marriage finally ended in 2001 after a drive to a concert in Cheltenham turned into an enormous argument.

Mark again told Lydia he wanted to leave – and this time Lydia filed for divorce. She told her family that staying in the marriage would destroy her.

Lydia says she was so ill that she can’t remember the monumental moment she told Mark about her suspicions about who Elspeth’s real father was. But she does recall a more sensible chat they had some time later, in which they agreed to keep the truth secret, and when Mark promised he would always treat Elspeth as his own.

‘I was more upset than he was,’ she says. ‘I don’t remember him crying. I had been terrified of confronting him with this as I’d lived with it for so long. But there was relief, somewhere, that it was all out. He seemed eerily calm, although I guess his anger was more slow-burning.’

As for Elspeth, she discovered the truth in 2002, when, at home from boarding school at the age of 17, she read her mother’s diary and found an entry about a love child.

She says she knew it referred to her as soon as she read it. The entry was ‘full of self-loathing and guilt’.

In 2004 she and her mother arranged a DNA test. When the results came through, Elspeth was at university in Exeter. Lydia believes that she was so emotionally fraught at the time that her reaction was numbed.

‘It was great to finally know,’ she says. ‘I had convinced myself for years that David was the father and then for more years that Mark was. It answered a niggling question. But what might sound odd is that it didn’t change things, not really. Mark was to all intents and purposes the father that Elspeth had always known.’

But Mark clearly did not feel the same way. As soon as he received the results, he went to the courts to get a document which allowed him to get Elspeth’s birth certificate amended.

He had a big black line drawn through the entry for ‘father’. ‘Mark has seen it as a loss,’ Lydia says. ‘He was told by a counsellor to treat it as a bereavement. But Elspeth isn’t dead. He went around telling everyone that he only had two children. He would walk into the house and take India out for lunch but not Elspeth. He’d just ignore her.’

Elspeth was hurt by his rejection, never more so than when he returned a pile of Father’s Day cards she had sent him over the years.

Lydia said she was devastated to see what Mark was doing to Elspeth.

‘As a mother, to see that unconditional love withdrawn was heartbreaking. It felt like he had been able to deal with it before it became public, but once that happened his pride got in the way.

‘I saw my daughter abandoned. She was distraught, and spent most of the time in tears. I was seething with anger.’

David was ‘quite shocked’ to find out he was the father, Lydia says, although the pair haven’t spoken in years. He did send a letter once, through a solicitor, saying he was sorry about her divorce and that Elspeth seemed to have turned into a ‘lovely young lady’. And in 2003, he came to see Lydia in an amateur dramatics production of, ironically enough, Alan Ayckbourn’s Bedroom Farce.

David and Elspeth are slowly building up a relationship and he has visited her in Rome, where she now lives.

Meanwhile, despite his promises, Mark would not let the paternity issue lie and started court proceedings against his former wife claiming she conspired to deceive him with ‘17 years of lies and deceit’.

It reached the Court of Appeal, the first such case to do so, but his claim was found not to have substance.

‘He is out to humiliate me,’ says Lydia. ‘He still wants to have some control after all this time. He was treating Elspeth as an unwanted toy he could just take back to the shop. In court he was just so cold. I kept wanting to scream at him, “How could you do this to her?”

‘Elspeth kept trying to get his acceptance again and again and he kept rejecting her.’

But, perhaps surprisingly given her ex-husband’s campaign, Lydia will not prevent her daughters from seeing him, saying: ‘That’s up to them. I’d be as bad as him if I started trying to control them.’

Now 22, Elspeth teaches English in Rome, while India is training to be an opera singer. Mark and Lydia’s youngest daughter attends a choir school.

Meanwhile Lydia, who is now remarried to Max, whom she met on the internet, is trying to start again.

‘I’m starting to remember the person I was,’ Lydia says. ‘It will be a long haul for all of us, especially Elspeth. But we’re strong and we’re a family. That’s the most important thing.’

…and this is what her daughter Elspeth says

My childhood was happy. I was close to Mark and confided a lot in him.

When I found out he wasn’t my dad, I was shocked, I had no idea, Mark was very upset but said I would always be his daughter.

But he started to change. By the time I finished school we were barely speaking.

He wanted me to come and live with him. I had to decide who to side with, a horrid decision. But I couldn’t leave Mum, she would be devastated. Because I made that decision, Mark said he couldn’t trust me.

He was really hurt that I wasn’t his daughter, his pride had been damaged in the worst way for a man. He felt humiliated. He was a broken man.

Mark got his name struck off my birth certificate – that really hurt. I don’t know whether I still see him as my dad but he’s my dad in my memories.

The Christmas before last, he sent back a bundle of my Father’s Day cards to him, ones hand-drawn by me. It really hurt.

I saw Mark in court and it was awful. It was the hardest time of my life. Although I wanted his request to be dismissed, I didn’t want him to be humiliated further.

I just wanted him to leave Mum alone for his sake as well as hers. It’s such a waste of two lives.

Mother jailed for seven years for incest and abuse

MARESE MCDONAGH and ELAINE EDWARDS

A Co Roscommon mother-of-six has been to sentenced seven years in prison after pleading guilty to incest, sexual assault and neglect of her children.

The woman was told by the sentencing judge she had destroyed the lives of her six children who ¿from the moment they were born knew nothing but cruelty and neglect¿.

Minister for Children Barry Andrews expressed his “absolute shock and abhorrence” at the facts of the case and said he had been informed today by the HSE that a preliminary investigation into the circumstances is already underway.

Children’s rights bodies and Opposition parties called for a full independent inquiry into the case and the ISPCC said the planned referendum on children’s rights should now be held.

Judge Miriam Reynolds, who also placed the accused on the Sex Offenders¿ Register, said it was the first known case of a woman having been convicted of incest. She said that in imposing sentence she was bound by legislation that was 101 years old, the Punishment of Incest Act 1908.

Under the Act, a man coming before the court on this charge would face life in prison but the maximum sentence for a woman was seven years, the judge said.

She said she believed that women should be treated equally before the law.

The way the legislation was drafted showed that it was not even contemplated by society at the time that a woman could be the perpetrator or instigator in the crime of incest, she added

Imposing sentence at Roscommon Circuit Court, Judge Reynolds said that any possibility of a normal and happy life had been stolen from the six children at the centre of this case by ¿the woman who calls herself their mother¿.

She pointed out that even now ¿these poor children were clinging to the hope¿ that their mother might get her act together and that they could go home.

She told the 40-year-old accused that she had ¿cast a long and dark shadow¿ over the lives of her children.

The court heard harrowing evidence of how the woman had forced one son to have sex with her when he was just 13 years old and she was 36.

The judge also heard that the children who were shunned at school because they smelled and were covered with lice and fleas, were forced to live in squalor, in a freezing, filthy home, over- run with mice and rats, where there was often no food, no heat and where rubbish was dumped in every room.

The judge said she did not know how the children could in the future be able to cope given what they had endured.

¿Six lives have been destroyed. There is no other way of putting it¿.

Judge Reynolds said the children felt guilty and felt as if they had done something wrong. ¿I want to assure them they did not,¿ she stressed.

The judge said that even at this stage she was being told that one of the teenage children who had contemplated suicide, might harm herself if her mother was imprisoned.

The judge stressed that this child was not responsible for her mother¿s actions. She said it was difficult for this girl and for all the children because the person they expected to nurture and look after and protect them had in fact been their abuser.

Counsel for the accused, Bernard Madden SC, had pointed out that a victim impact report suggested that one of the woman¿s daughters had very mixed emotions about her mother and that she longed to be with her.

This child felt she was being punished by being put in care, she had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and had talked about wanting to kill herself. Counsel expressed concern that if the child¿s mother was sentenced that this could be a precipitating factor ¿in her doing something she should not do¿.

Before imposing sentence the judge said she was taking into account the fact that the mother had pleaded guilty, thus saving her children, who had been through so much from the added trauma of having to give evidence.

That would have been ¿an appalling vista¿ given that some of the children were still of tender years.

Describing this as a ¿final act of mercy¿ by the mother, the judge said it was perhaps ¿the only act of kindness she ever bestowed on them since they were born¿.

As their mother the accused had ¿a very particular position of trust¿ in the household but the trust had been shattered.

¿There was violence. She had dominion over them,¿ said Judge Reynolds.

Mr Madden had told the court that his client accepted responsibility for her actions and wanted to apologise to her children for her failures and for her role in destroying their lives.

She accepted she had done irreparable harm to the children she bore. Her biggest regret was the loss of her children and the fact that they must hold her in contempt, given what she had done and what she had allowed to happen to them.

The accused was sentenced to six years in prison on each of the two incest charges. Two sentences of seven years were imposed on the charges of sexual assault on her son ¿ which carry a maximum sentence of 14 years.

Des Dockerey BL, counsel for the State, pointed out that three of the offences of willful neglect and ill-treatment of her children were committed before the Children¿s Act 2001 came into force and therefore the maximum sentence was two years.

Three further counts of neglect were dated from 2002 to 2004 and carried a maximum penalty of seven years.

Judge Reynolds imposed sentences of 18 months each for the three earlier charges and of six years each for the three later neglect charges. All sentences are to run concurrently from today.

Single mother who allowed her son aged THREE to smoke cigarettes at home walks free from court

article-1126660-0325b397000005dc-585_233x423

Free to go: Kelly Marie Pocock allowed her three-year-old son to smoke at home

A young mother who allowed her three-year-old son to smoke cigarettes at home was freed by a judge today – for her children’s sake.

Mother-of-three Kelly Marie Pocock, 24, was accused of letting the little boy smoke in his bedroom and around the house.

A court heard family friend was so concerned she used her mobile phone to film the youngster puffing away.

She handed the evidence to social services who alerted police. Pocock was arrested for child cruelty.

The single mother was yesterday given a 40-week jail sentence – but it was suspended for two years after a judge said her children had suffered enough.

The judge spared her an immediate prison sentence after hearing Pocock had attended six parenting classes and was ‘now putting her children before herself’.

Judge John Curron said of the case: ‘This is one of the most extraordinary I have ever come across.’

Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court heard social workers were shocked when they saw the mobile phone video.

Prosecutor Jonathan Rees said: ‘The video demonstrates the boy placing a cigarette into his mouth, lighting it with a lighter and sucking.

‘He was drawing smoke clearly into the lungs and seems to do it with some accomplishment.

‘It doesn’t cause him any discomfort. He is sat on a chair close to the mother, who is talking on the phone.

‘It’s clear that the boy, at the age of three, knows what to do with a lighter and cigarette.’

Pocock’s friend Natasha Dudley, 25, filmed the little boy smoking while visiting the family home in the village of Merthyr Vale, near Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales.

Mr Rees said: ‘Miss Dudley went to look for the boy after he had been missing for half an hour.

‘She found him under a bed with some cigarettes. He was actually smoking one and Miss Dudley said it looked like he had been smoking for many years.

‘When the boy was taken downstairs he went into the living room where he picked up a cigarette butt from an ashtray and smoked it.

‘Pocock was on the telephone at the time so Miss Dudley decided to film the boy, such was her concern.’

Merthyr Tydfil social services were given the video and they brought in police to investigate Pocock who has three children aged between and five.

Jobless Pocock claimed she was ’shocked’ by the allegation and did not realise her little boy was smoking because she was on the phone at the time.

Claire Wilks, defending, said: ‘She has now been able to prove herself both to her children and, perhaps more importantly, their social worker.

‘She has attended six parenting courses since the incident.

‘One of the changes has been her maturing and putting the children before herself.’

Judge Curran said: ‘This is one of the most extraordinary cases I’ve ever come across.

‘The boy would not have been able to smoke without discomfort unless he had acquired a habit.’

The judge told Pocock: ‘This is an appalling situation and I don’t see how you could have been unaware of the fact.

‘This offence would normally cross the custody threshold but I do not want to cause your children any further emotional harm by separating them from you.’

Judge Curran also imposed a 12-month supervision order on Pocock.

Girl, 2, ‘murdered by mother and stepfather had suffered over 100 injuries in shocking campaign of violence’

A toddler who was murdered by her mother and stepfather suffered 107 injuries in a month-long campaign of violence, a court has heard.

The two-year-old allegedly endured appalling physical abuse in the home of Zahbeena Navsarka and her fiancé Subhan Anwar, both 21.

Sanam Navsarka’s arms and legs were broken and she died from the effects of her untreated fractures, Bradford Crown Court was told.

article-0-030ae4b4000005dc-992_468x3502

Baby Sam Navsarka suffered a campaign of violence in which more than 100 injuries were inflicted on her before she died

Sanam was afraid of the dark but was shut inside an unlit cupboard by Anwar ‘as a punishment’, the court heard. He and Navsarka exacerbated her nappy rash by applying aftershave to bleeding sores and there was evidence she was battered with two metal poles.

The catalogue of injuries found by doctors after her death was caused during the last four weeks of her life. Sanam was left to cope in agony and increasingly unable to walk, the court heard.

article-1114502-030bb187000005dc-820_233x4933

In handcuffs: Accused Subhan Anwar is lead away from court

On the day she died, May 8 last year, Sanam was left alone at home while Navsarka and Anwar had a health check at their local GP’s surgery.

‘At no stage did either of the defendants seek help for Sanam when it was obvious that she was in a great deal of pain,’ said Julian Goose, QC, prosecuting.

The girl was taken to hospital at 11pm after Anwar made a 999 call, telling the operator she had been found unconscious in the bath.

Paramedics arrived at the house in Huddersfield to find Sanam naked on the kitchen floor being given the kiss of life by a neighbour. Mr Goose told the jury it was not known who had inflicted the injuries, but they were both ‘in it together’.

Jurors were reduced to tears by contrasting video footage recorded on a mobile phone. The first showed a pig-tailed Sanam laughing and happy. The second, recorded by Anwar on the day before the girl died, showed her, eyes bulging and shaking as she had a fit on the floor.

The fits Sanam was having were a direct result of the effects on her body of her fractured thighbones, the court heard.

Navsarka was living alone in a council flat when Sanam was born on Christmas Eve 2005. The father played no part in her life.

In February 2008 Navsarka met Anwar, who was married. His wife was pregnant but he was unhappy with the marriage and moved in with his lover. The couple were given a council house and they moved in on April 1. After Sanam was withdrawn from her nursery creche the ‘real violence’ began, the court heard.

‘Sanam was repeatedly assaulted and her arms and legs were each fractured as the defendants caused or encouraged each other to cause Sanam to receive really serious injuries which led to her death,’ said Mr Goose.

article-1114502-030ae4b7000005dc-754_468x349

The house in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, where baby Sanam was found dead

Neighbours said Anwar shouted at the child calling her a ‘little b******’. He also left her precariously balanced on a windowsill 5ft up. CCTV recordings found by police showed the girl was being carried in her final days because she was unable to walk. Sanam was declared dead shortly after her arrival at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary.

A post-mortem examination revealed the 107 injuries over her body. They included 36 bruises to her head and neck, 26 to her arms and ten to her abdomen.

Both defendants deny murder. Anwar denies a second charge of causing or allowing the death of a child. Navsarka pleaded guilty to that charge.

The trial continues.

Murder Suicide – woman kills 7-year old son then kills herself

A mother in Addis Louisiana killed her 7-year old son then killed herself on Thursday allegedly over her husband’s infidelity. Police say Lavinia Banks, 34, shot her son Dareyonne at least three times, put his body in a tub filled with water then shot herself in the head with a .38-caliber revolver.

dareyonne-banks

Dareyonne Banks (7-year-old victim)

The gruesome scene was discovered by the woman’s husband, Don Banks Jr., when he arrived home from work. Police say the murder suicide was planned as the mother carefully laid out funeral clothes for herself and her son on a bed.

Police also say they had been called to the home on a previous occasion and that there had been an ongoing feud between Lavinia DeShawn Banks and her husband over a child her husband fathered with another woman during the course of their marriage.

Family of Lavinia Banks claim the woman with whom Don Banks Jr. had an affair and fathered a child had been harrassing Lavinia Banks.

Midwife avoids jail after driving daughter to school while FIVE times over alcohol limit

article-1097483-02d7c589000005dc-427_233x423

Eithne Robertson arrives at Eastbourne Magistrates' Court

A midwife drove her daughter to school with almost five times the legal limit of alcohol in her system after downing whisky and wine until 4am, a court has been told.

Eithne Robertson, 51, sobbed as she was given a suspended jail sentence.

The divorcee crashed her Skoda Octavia after dropping off her eight-year-old child.

Police officers found Robertson crying at the wheel and a breath test revealed she had 166mg of alcohol in every 100ml of breath. The legal limit is 35mg.

Magistrates in Eastbourne, East Sussex, said it was ‘a miracle’ that no-one was hurt and gave Robertson a six-week custodial sentence suspended for 12 months.

They also banned her from driving for three years and ordered her to complete a drink-driving rehabilitation programme.

The court heard that Robertson, a nurse and midwife for 30 years, also faced losing her job.

Prosecutor Jeremy King told the court that Robertson, of Eastbourne, dropped her eight-year-old daughter off at the school gates just before 9am on November 14.

She was then seen driving erratically. Mr King said: ‘She was swerving from side to side, speeding up and slowing down again, and then eventually collided with another car.’

Robertson caused £1,500 of damage to the other car but carried on driving. Another driver who witnessed the crash followed her car and when she stopped a few streets away was able to remove the keys from the ignition.

Mr King added: ‘The police were called and she was arrested after failing a breath test. She then broke down crying, saying, “I’m so ashamed of myself”.’

Robertson, who admitted driving with excess alcohol at an earlier hearing, wept as the court was told that she had suffered problems in her personal life in recent years.

Tara Celikoz, for Robertson, said her sister had died from a brain haemorrhage and she had gone through a divorce after her husband met another woman.

Miss Celikoz said that Robertson had turned to drink as a result of depression.

On the evening before the offence, she drank wine and whisky with a friend before going to bed at 11pm.

She then woke up at 3am and drank more whisky before returning to bed.

She then got up at 7.30am to get her daughter ready for school. Miss Celikoz said: ‘She accepts that taking her daughter to school was foolish. This has been a wake-up call for her and she has not drunk since.’

Miss Celikoz added: ‘She has worked hard to get where she is today. She has studied for years and is highly respected in the NHS. She finds this whole thing very humiliating.’

Chairman of the bench Stephanie Parkes-Crick said: ‘You drove with a very high level of alcohol in your body – nearly five times over the limit.

‘You’ve put your child, yourself and other road users in danger. It was a miracle no one was hurt.’

Mother accused of stabbing sons to death ‘tried to abandon older boy at A&E last year’

The mother accused of killing her two young sons had previously tried to abandon the older boy, it was revealed today.

Jael Mullings dumped two-year-old Romario – with a note attached to him – at the A&E department of a hospital near her home in June 2007. Then in November she left the boy at a doctor’s surgery.

Social workers had been monitoring the family, but closed their file on Ms Mullings, judging that the mother was capable of caring for her children with the support of ‘other agencies’. Today, an investigation into that decision was under way.

Romario Mullings, two, and his brother, three-month-old Delayno, were found stabbed in the chest by horrified relatives on Wednesday night. Both boys were known to social services.

Stabbed to death: Romario Mullings, two, and three-month-old brother Delayno

Their mother, 21-year- old Jael Mullings, was seen shouting indiscriminately at strangers and claiming people were trying to shoot her or bomb her a few hours before her sons were killed.

The woman’s GP called police with fears for her safety but by the time officers found her semi- detached council house in Cheetham Hill, North Manchester, she had left, taking the boys with her.

More than fours later their bodies were found at the house. Miss Mullings was arrested nearby on suspicion of murder and detained under the Mental Health Act.

Inquiries into the tragedy have been launched – one to investigate why police didn’t trace Miss Mullings in time and another to establish whether her children’s lives should have been saved.

Manchester council announced it is reviewing social services’ involvement in the tragedy and the Independent Police Complaints Commission said it was investigating police handling of the incident.

Scene of tragedy: The family's council house in Cheetham Hill, North Manchester

A key question they will try to answer was why social services had apparently not previously notified

police that Miss Mullings had two vulnerable children, something which could have seen the hunt given a higher priority.

Romario and Delayno had previously been monitored by the council’s children’s services department but were not on the child protection register.

It is thought that social workers had ceased regular contact following Delayno’s birth in July.

Neighbours on the deprived estate told how Miss Mullings had been behaving increasingly erratically, although she is not thought to have been diagnosed with mental health problems.

But on Wednesday she was seen shouting indiscriminately at passers-by at the local shopping precinct and marching around, yelling threateningly.

Last night friends said she had been a devoted mother and claimed her outburst had been a cry for help.

Sandra Barnes, 41, said: ‘She was shouting, ‘Are you going to bomb me? Are you going to shoot me?’ People were bringing their kids inside.’

Another neighbour said: ‘She was shouting at people walking past. She seemed more scared than angry.’

Miss Mullings contacted her GP who asked a member of surgery staff to ring police at
1.20pm. But officers were given five possible addresses for her and it was not until 2.50pm that they found the right house, by which time she was apparently not home.

They hammered on the door, searched nearby streets and tried to contact Miss Mullings’s relatives, but there was no sign of her.

However neighbours told them she had been seen on the estate pushing Romario and Delayno in their double buggy.

Then at just before 5.45pm Miss Mullings is thought to have called her mother, Andrea, to tell her the children were dead.

The children’s grandmother rushed round and called for an ambulance, but paramedics found both boys with fatal stab wounds to their chests.

Friends of Miss Mullings said she had always seemed to look after the children well and questioned why social workers didn’t intervene to protect them after she started acting strangely.

Investigation: Forensic officers entering the house yesterday after the discovery

Melissa Bell, 23, said: ‘I think it’s really sad. It’s a cry for help and she never got the help she needed. It’s got to be depression for her to do something so desperate like that.’

Mrs Barnes added: ‘We suspect social services have failed both children because she was clearly a troubled woman – someone should have done something sooner to avoid this terrible tragedy.’

Yesterday the boys’ family released a statement saying they were ‘completely devastated’ at the deaths of the ‘beautiful, innocent children’.

Detective Superintendent Shaun Donnellan said emergency services workers who were called to the house have been given counselling.

‘It’s impossible to try to understand what they were faced with other than to say it’s something no human being should ever have to see in their life,’ he added.

Police had previously dealt with Miss Mullings on what they called ‘minor criminal matters’ not related to child welfare.

Distraught: Tearful neighbours console each other over the double-tragedy

Mr Donnellan said he was ‘100 per cent sure’ his officers had done all they could.

A police source said: ‘We’d had no contact from social services expressing concern about the family, and questions are being asked as to why that didn’t happen.’

Manchester council confirmed that the boys were known to its children’s care team but said they were not being seen by social workers at the time of their deaths.

Pauline Newman, director of the council’s children’s services, said: ‘This is an appalling tragedy and we offer our sincere condolences to the family.’

Local MP Graham Stringer said: ‘There needs to be a full investigation of all the professionals that either have or could have been involved in this case.’